Skip to content
Home » Editorial Policy

Editorial Policy

Our Editorial Mission

Local SEO is full of bad advice. We built GBP Faster to cut through the noise and deliver operational reality. Our mission is simple. We test Google Business Profile strategies, document the exact outcomes, and publish the raw data. We don’t regurgitate Google’s official help documentation. Those documents leave massive blind spots for actual business owners. We fill those gaps with hard evidence.

You need to turn people who find you on Search and Maps into paying customers. We exist to show you exactly how to do that. We focus entirely on the mechanics of local search visibility. We ignore theoretical SEO debates. We care about what actually moves a local business from position eight to the top three map pack.

How We Select Topics

We base our content calendar on the real friction local businesses face every day. Topics come directly from our agency client work and live market data. If three HVAC contractors in Phoenix get hit with a fake review attack, we write a guide on review management and removal. We look at search data to find where practitioners are stuck. We read the forums. We test the solutions. We publish the results.

We refuse to cover generic marketing fluff. You won’t find articles here about general branding or social media theory. We stick to our exact area of expertise. We cover NAP consistency, proximity signals, review velocity, and GBP suspension recoveries. If a topic doesn’t directly impact your local search ranking, we don’t cover it.

Research and Fact-Checking Standards

We don’t publish guesses. Every claim on this site anchors to a specific test or a documented case study. Before we recommend a tactic for optimizing your GBP Q&A section, we deploy it across at least 20 live profiles. We track the proximity signal shifts. We measure the review velocity. If a strategy drops a client from position two to position seven, we document the failure.

Our fact-checking process requires secondary verification. We cross-reference our manual findings with established local SEO tools like Whitespark, BrightLocal, or Pleper. We verify category rules against active local search algorithms, not outdated blog posts. A dedicated local SEO specialist reviews every technical claim before publication.

Our Stance on Official Guidelines

Google tells business owners to make their information as complete as possible. They advise you to use naturally phrased keywords. They conveniently leave out the exact mechanics of how a single wrong primary category choice destroys your visibility. We bridge that gap.

We respect the core guidelines to keep your profile safe from algorithmic suspensions. We also test the boundaries to find out exactly what triggers a proximity filter. When Google’s official advice contradicts what we see in the live search results, we side with the live data. We will always tell you when a recommended tactic carries a risk of profile suspension.

Corrections Policy

Google updates the local algorithm constantly. Sometimes our data becomes obsolete. Sometimes we just make a mistake. When we get it wrong, we fix it fast.

We own our errors publicly.

If you spot an inaccuracy, email our editorial team at [email protected]. We review all claims within 48 hours. If a correction is warranted, we update the page immediately. We place a visible correction notice at the bottom of the affected article detailing exactly what changed and when.

Commercial Relationships and Transparency

Running a high-resolution testing operation costs money. We fund this site through agency services and select affiliate partnerships. If you click a link to a local citation builder or a rank tracking tool and buy a subscription, we earn a commission.

This financial relationship never dictates our editorial stance. We routinely publish negative reviews of tools that pay high commissions. If a citation service delivers garbage links, we say so. If a review generation tool violates Google’s terms of service, we call it out by name. Your trust matters more than a quick payout.

Strict Editorial Independence

Nobody outside our core editorial team influences our content calendar. We don’t accept sponsored posts. We don’t sell link placements. Software vendors cannot pay us to alter a review or bump their product up a list.

When a local SEO software company pitches us a new feature, we test it independently. If it fails to move the needle on map pack visibility, we reject the pitch. Our loyalty belongs entirely to the local business owners and SEO practitioners reading our site.

Content Updates and Freshness

Stale local SEO advice destroys rankings. A tactic that worked flawlessly last spring will trigger a hard suspension today. We audit our entire content library every 90 days. We check every guide against the current reality of the local search results.

If a strategy stops working, we rewrite the guide.

You’ll always see a “Last Updated” date at the top of our articles. That date means a real practitioner reviewed the text, tested the claims, and verified the accuracy against live Google Business Profiles. We archive outdated articles that no longer serve a practical purpose.